Last week’s This Week in Reaction is up over at Social Matter. As always, there were many excellent articles throughout the sphere. Those considered “official” award-winning were as follows:
Honorable Mentions:
James A. Donald: Emancipation of women was a fitness test that we failed. I described this as an instant classic. Gives full voice to neoreactionary sex realism, accompanied by documentary evidence and reasoning. His contrast of 18th century and 19th century views of female sexuality is alone worth the price of admission. The Anglosphere’s been pozzed for a lot longer than most people think.
Richard A. Brookes: Rotherham. Goes beyond the standard Alt-Right “Remove Kebab” rhetoric to look at the broken UK white working class and the extent to which “Asians” (Pakis) have taken over the political aparatus of increasingly shit tier towns. None of which is to be construed that we don’t need to Remove Kebab.
Esoteric Trad Out of Hollow States a Hollow People. A supremely thoughtful essay on how those within government trade their loyalty to the people for loyalty to their jobs in government. A mile wide but an inch deep. And what happens when the people wise up to this and decide they don’t have any loyalty to give back?
Watson: The Michigan Plot. Watson guest-posts at Count ∅-Face’s blog. An enormous amount of research here in drawing up the relationships between really just a handful of mostly academic conspirators behind radical opposition to US Vietnam involvement. These professors had a strategy, knew exactly what they were doing, knew how they wanted it all to be perceived, and executed brilliantly. A well-organized expert conspiracy will always dominate a mass movement. Especially when the former is made to look like a mass movement itself. Silent majorities are generally worthless, even when they don’t remain silent.
The Top Spot:
Esoteric Trad: Leftism and Islam. You would think that Leftism and Islam would be mortal enemies. But you’d be wrong. Arthur sets in place all the reasons why. Well researched and perfectly argued.
“Silent majorities are generally worthless, even when they don’t remain silent.”
Amen to this.
LikeLiked by 1 person