This Week in Reaction

The Social Pathologist on Richwine’s relatively unapologetic rebuttal. Sad to say, it’s who?-whom? all the way down, Jason.

VXXC introduced me to Pundita, apparently a woman who blogs quite sensibly about economics and politics. Whoah! Isn’t that like a black pro golfer or a white rapper or a black president or something?

Much is being made of a possible rift in the manosphere. Can’t say I have much of a horse in that race, but apparently it’s news. The Reaction® has use of all who will follow the truth where it leads.

Foseti on the implicit ranking of sportsmen’s crimes. Also an epic link dump, in which the Anarcho-Papist gets some notice. (Hey, Foseti, I discovered him first!)

Speaking of Mr. Laliberte: Herein he defends ideology. Wherein I take offense. (There’s a semantic disconnect in there somewhere…)

Venerable Jim on funding science.

Via Isegoria, 19 true things that generals cannot say in public about the Afghan war (or how we managed to lose yet another war). Plus how Elysium may not be the piece of agitprop leftists want it to be (to say nothing of mainstream rightists).

Theden. Go there every day. Not just when I tell you to. It really seems Morganston and Clarius are carefully targeting, for lack of a better term, VXXC’s people. Not so much high theory as creating a new syntax to talk about how screwed the under 30 crowd is today.

Malcolm Pollack notices Radish and Theden.

Chuck talks with Hugo. Chuck’s gettin’ to be like a regular journalist or somethin’.

Dalrock ponders what women get out of sex (or at least try to), explores the profound difference between out-of-wedlock births and single-parenting, and exposes yet another example of feminism masquerading as Christian teaching on marriage.

Sunshine Mary brings her experiences of Russia to her commentary on the strangely sexy feminist hell that is Russia. Plus, if men are good for nothing, what are women good for?

Evolutionary biologists tell us only about half of all men who ever lived reproduced, but north of 90% of women who ever lived managed to do so. So if you’re a man who fails to reproduce, you’re below average. And nobody wants to be below average. But if you’re a woman who intentionally fails to do so, how pathological must you be?

This just in: VXXC informs us Eastasia correspondent Spandrell emerged from his Vow of Silence with several good posts.

That’s it for now… til next “week”… The Reactivity Place, Over and Out.