This Week in Reaction

In memorium--our civil service as it was Anomalyuk speaks a great deal of sense on behalf of the Unimportance of Policy:

I do not hold it at all likely that a newly-installed reactionary regime will immediately establish a state exactly according to my particular vision. So be it. A reactionary ruler has a precious attribute that no non-reactionary ruler can have: his legitimacy is independent of his policy.

I think it was Bl. John Lennon himself who said (something to the effect), “Imagine legitimacy independent of policy… It’s easy if you try.” Our Inuit friend continues:

One of the great problems of democracy is that those in power… largely achieve it by associating themselves with specific policies, and are therefore subject to overwhelming incentive to hold those same policies regardless of evidence. The shift of power from politicians to academics was intended to solve this problem, but it only resulted in turning academics into politicians, their academic positions tied to the policies they support, and no more able to recant an error than an elected representative.

Actually, the problem is made, at least slightly, and often very much, worse by the fact that the academic is in a stronger position to manufacture consent than the mere politician. Oh, for the days of the Spoils System, where at least the Graft & Corruption was Graft & Corruption you could believe in!

Sunshine Mary is a one woman, permanent, guerilla war on feminism. Mr. Sunshine, whoever he is, has found himself a keeper. (I have too, of course, but she doesn’t blog.)

Foseti and then Jim on moral progress, or rather its antonym: “moral progress”.

New guy Alban Johnson, blogging at Oblige Nobility has contributed to the Reaction a few posts dealing with strategies to restore genuine traditional morality vis-à-vis the more pharisaic variety regnant in these latter days. From his latest:

I’ve chosen the neologism “remoralization” to stand for the urgently-needed program of reviving the morals that made Western civilization exceptional. Remoralization, as a movement, includes the offensive strategy of demoralizing the GLIC morality (Globalism/ Liberal Imperialism/ Collectivism). It also requires the creative dissemination of reinterpreted traditional morals through the use of myth, story, symbol, and ritual.

Yep. We gotta get us some of dat…

Mrs. Steves and I attended the NYC area Orthosphere meetup last night and had a great time, tho’ alas we did yet again fail to solve at least a few of the world’s problems. Too much beer perhaps. If you’ve got ants in your pants and just can’t wait to get to the Big Mega Reactin’ Crackin’ Heads Stage, you can do a lot worse than attend reactionary meetups in your own Tri-State Area. If one doesn’t exist, man up (or woman up) and start one. “Iron sharpeneth iron, so a man sharpeneth the countenance of his friend.” (Proverbs 27:17).

That’s it for now… til next “week”… The Reactivity Place, Over and Out.

Published by

nickbsteves

If I have not seen as far as others, it was because giants were standing on my shoulders.

6 thoughts on “This Week in Reaction”

  1. “the fatal flaw of the Modern Structure: by tying legitimacy to particular policies, it produces policy based on what sounds good in an ivory tower”. And hence the importance of the “King”. However the only King we’ll have in America Sir is the Constitution or something nearly identical – and what’s the point of risking all and journeying through mordor and back again when you already …have one? I refer to the document of 1789.

    There’s many sayings about not waiting for perfect plans, go with the good one. More true when it’s got broad agreement. There’s also the matter that many millions took an oath to it, and many of the most dangerous and tenacious of those hold The Oath Sacred. Which it is.

    As to generational Long Games: Let there be trouble in my time [there is] not my children’s.

    We already have kick the can down the road. We’re at the end of that road. Faced with a choice of conflict or kick the can down the road, all chose kick the can down the road. Now that conflict and those consequences are certain to be more severe.

    And we’re almost completely out of road.

    Ta.

    Like

  2. I live in ny and have recently started to (obsessively) follow different reactionary blogs. Where can I find out when there will be another reactionary meet up, as I’d love to meet up with others, debate, have a beer, etc.

    Like

  3. Thanks for the linkage! I like these weekly link ups you do; I’ve been around the manosphere for awhile, but I’m sort of newish to the wider reactionary sphere, so it’s nice to know what I should be reading.

    “Mr. Sunshine” made me laugh. Actually, my name really is Sunshine, but my husband uses a handle – he’s “holyhandgrenade” but everyone around my site calls him HHG for short.

    Hope you have a happy Father’s Day this weekend!

    Like

  4. O crap, Father’s day… fortunately another made-up holiday I don’t have to “do anything” for…

    Honest: what I asked for for Fathers’ Day was the complete absence of recognition or reminder that it was Fathers’ Day. And if I can get that, it will have been a *great* Fathers’ Day. Fortunately, it happens to be #6’s birthday… so maybe I’ll get what I really want.

    Like

  5. VXXC: the document of 1789 has about as much relevance to the Governing Classes today as has the Bible in Modern Christianity. To the extent it is acknowledged at all, it is a quaint artifact, a wholly symbolic icon of unity of a people who have “moved beyond” it. Tho’ there is no doubt that we’d be far better off living under The Constitution (frozen, as it were, in time), the window to make that happen closed about 150 years ago. Politics never freezes in time… you have to get very very close to absolute zero for that.

    Like

Comments are closed.